VISUAL PROPERTY WORKSPACE · LIVE
104 W Roanoke Park Dr, Raleigh, NC
Internal ID: LOCAL · PROJ-45f
BETA · Raleigh / Wake County, NC only. Every layer below names its own source and what it does not establish. Data & map notices · Sample plan viewer (demo) — Prototype concept — PlanGen does not yet read uploaded plan content.
SITE SUMMARY
Preliminary geometric approximation based on the recorded parcel and selected zoning setback assumptions. Not a survey, permit determination, or legal buildable-area determination.
This is not a deterministic legal answer. PlanGen is not the authority having jurisdiction and reaches no entitlement or buildability decision. What follows is what public records show (evidence-cited), what appears worth exploring next — bounded possibilities, not a determination that they are buildable — and what cannot be determined yet from these sources.
SEE ON THE MAP
It has not yet been determined whether Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (Five Points East (Core)) applies to the whole parcel, only part of it, or only the mapped address point.
Material conditions found
- Parcel vs. point
- "Point" means the single mapped address location. "Parcel" means the whole lot boundary. A fact that is true at one is not automatically true at the other.
- Setback
- A setback is the minimum distance a building must sit from a property line. The number here is a mapped reference, not a survey-confirmed line.
- UDO / FTDO
- The UDO (Unified Development Ordinance) is Raleigh's zoning and development rulebook. The Frequent Transit Development Option (FTDO) is a conditional, optional pathway some parcels near frequent transit can explore -- it is not an approval and does not by itself expand what a specific site may build.
- Confirm with the city's planning and zoning staff whether Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (Five Points East (Core)) applies to the whole parcel, only part of it, or only the mapped address point.the city's planning and zoning staff
- Confirm the applicable setback minimums for this district with a licensed design professional (architect or engineer) before finalizing any building footprint.a licensed design professional (architect or engineer)
- Label the uploaded sheets with their sheet names/numbers so they can be indexed; none are labeled yet.you
Decision summary
A plain-language summary of what has been checked so far, built only from what is already recorded on this project. This is not a recommendation and not a professional judgment.
This address matched a specific property record — no conflicts were found between the address, geocode match, and parcel record compared for property identity.
WHAT WE KNOW
- Address104 W Roanoke Park Dr, Raleigh, NC, 27608. Public-record match.Owner provided + independently matched
- Inside Raleigh city limitsYesPublic record
- Zoning districtR-10
Residential-10
Public record - Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD)Mapped at this address point — Five Points East (Core). Parcel-wide applicability not determined from the current source.
An NCOD adds neighbourhood-specific rules on top of the base zoning.
Public record - Flood zoneZone X. A mapped flood designation covers the whole parcel. (Area Of Minimal Flood Hazard)FEMA
- FloodwayNo floodway at the address point or across the parcel, per the FEMA record.FEMA
- Lot size0.17 deed acres; about 0.17 acres (7,275 sq ft) from the mapped parcel boundary.
The mapped boundary is not a survey.
Public record
DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS / WHAT IT MEANS
- Frequent Transit AreaYes. The whole parcel is inside the City's mapped Frequent Transit Area.Mapped context
- Frequent Transit Development OptionAvailable.
Creates access to additional building types and reduced lot-area, setback and lot-width minimums under UDO Sec. 2.7.1. This does not guarantee approval, a specific density, or a specific unit count, and not every development type automatically qualifies -- see the comparison below for what actually governs on this parcel.
UDO - Five Points East (Core) interactionThe NCOD still controls any rule that conflicts with the Frequent Transit option.UDO
- Opportunity areaShown on the workspace map when this deployment's geometry feature is enabled.
A uniform inward offset of the mapped parcel boundary by the largest recorded UDO minimum setback for the base district -- an illustration of setback geometry, not a buildable-area determination, not a survey, and it does not account for easements, utilities, stormwater, trees, or overlay standards.
NEEDS VERIFICATION
- Five Points East (Core) — parcel-wide applicabilityNot determined from the current source
Whether Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD) applies to the whole parcel, only part of it, or only the mapped address point has not been determined.
Public record - Five Points East (Core) numeric rulesNot independently verified
This NCOD's specific lot-size, setback and height numbers have not been verified against the ordinance text by this pipeline.
UDO
WHAT WE HAVE NOT CHECKED
- Building footprintNot retrieved this run
Building footprints are not persisted in this enrichment snapshot, so none is recorded here and no conclusion about structures follows from this field. PlanGen can retrieve one live from the City of Raleigh Building_Footprints source when the workspace map is viewed, for a property whose identity is independently corroborated, as this one currently is.
- Outside this product's scopeMarket Economics, Stormwater, Survey, Title Easements, Topography, Trees, Utilities
This product does not check these at all -- they are not gaps in this run, they are never attempted by this product. A licensed professional, a title company, or the appropriate public record is required for each.
WHAT MATTERS NOW
No findings have been recorded.
Requires professional verification: Setbacks.
Conditions found: Zoning, Overlays, Plans & documents.
Checked, conditional/mapped-context only: Frequent transit / urban form, Lot geometry & dimensions.
Not checked yet: Building footprint.
Share what has been checked so far from the Export / Reports tab — it carries the same findings and evidence shown here.
PlanGen is not the authority having jurisdiction and reaches no decision.